That was a recent search term someone used to find my blog.
An elective C-section ought to be cheaper than an emergency C-section. The only exception might be if an elective C-section ends up having complications while an emergency C-section does not.
First, a clarification of terms — some people, including most doctors performing studies, call any unplanned C-section an “emergency”. Most lay people would probably assume that an “emergency C-section” would mean a surgery that was not just unplanned, but actually was an emergency, such as if the fetal heartbeat were absent.
In doctor parlance, however, the following conditions would be considered “emergency”:
- after going into labor, it was discovered that the baby was breech (although the baby was in no danger)
- mom takes too long to dilate (according to the doctor’s strict time rules)
- mom takes too long to push the baby out (according to the doctor’s strict time rules)
- maternal exhaustion
- mom decides she’s tired of labor in the middle of it, so opts for a C-section instead
- baby’s heartbeat zigs when it should have zagged, and the doctors are afraid of a lawsuit
Studies have shown that emergency C-sections (that is, unplanned C-sections that were performed after labor began) have a higher rate of complications, including things like maternal hemorrhage, need for hysterectomy, maternal infection, etc. Should these complications occur — which are more likely in unplanned than planned C-sections — then it is obvious that hospital costs rise. There is cost involved in blood transfusions, antibiotics, longer hospital stay, additional surgery, longer surgery, etc. But I haven’t seen a study which looks at true emergency C-sections (like, immediately running the mom on the gurney into the OR and topping up her epidural or putting her completely out) and just unplanned non-emergency C-sections (you know the kind — the ones that start up to an hour or so after the decision to perform a C-section has been made)
However, the cost of an uncomplicated vaginal birth is less than a C-section, complicated or not. And if you attempt a vaginal birth, you are likely to succeed (as high as the C-section rate is, it’s still much less than half of all planned vaginal births). So, if you’re looking at this from a cost-benefit angle, where best is cheapest, a planned and successful vaginal birth is best, followed by an elective C-section, with an emergency C-section bringing up the rear.
It’s hard enough getting data on actual costs of births divided by vaginal and C-section without having them also divided into planned and unplanned. However, we can assume that more unplanned C-sections ended up having complications than planned ones, and that they therefore would be more expensive, on average, than planned C-sections (which should have a lower rate of complications). But looking at successful vaginal births — even those with complications — show them to be much cheaper than even uncomplicated C-sections.
Filed under: birth choices, C-section | Tagged: baby, birth, birth center, C-section, CNM, cost of a c-section, cost of birth, cost of vaginal birth, CPM, elective C-section, emergency C-section, health, home birth, hospital birth, midwife, midwifery, midwives, obstetrician, obstetricians, pregnancy, pregnant |